Problem while uninitializing the ommconsumer

sagar.s

Hi Team,

I'm getting concurrent modification exception issue when trying to close the ommcomsumer. Can you please take a look at the issue? Is it a known issue in the api?

Nov 20, 2017 5:11:54 PM com.thomsonreuters.ema.access.ChannelDictionary processCallback WARNING: loggerMsg ClientName: ChannelDictionary Severity: Warning Text: RDMDictionary stream was closed with status message streamId 3 Reason State: Closed/Suspect/None - text: "Login stream was closed." loggerMsgEnd Nov 20, 2017 5:11:54 PM com.thomsonreuters.ema.access.ChannelDictionary processCallback

WARNING: loggerMsg ClientName: ChannelDictionary Severity: Warning Text: RDMDictionary stream was closed with status message streamId 4 Reason State: Closed/Suspect/None - text: "Login stream was closed." loggerMsgEnd

Exception in thread "main" java.util.ConcurrentModificationException at java.util.HashMap$HashIterator.remove(HashMap.java:1451) at com.thomsonreuters.ema.access.OmmBaseImpl.rsslReactorDispatchLoop(Unknown Source) at com.thomsonreuters.ema.access.OmmBaseImpl.uninitialize(Unknown Source)

Michal Frajt

Note that the OMMConsumer.uninitialize() method call will very likely fail if there are many items still registered receiving updates. Unregistering all items, waiting a bit, calling OMMConsumer.uninitialize() might mitigate the risk of failure, but still you might hit the moment when the dispatch thread is processing some heartbeat or info messages and get into the same CME error.
The OMMBaseConsumer synchronization model between caller threads and dispatch thread is wrong or rather not existing at all causing CME and other errors being thrown randomly (more you use it, more error situations you get).

Nipat Kunvutipongsak

Hello @sagar.s,

There was a similar exception message and this problem has been submitted to the developer already.

Reference:

Question - ConcurrentModificationException in EMA

Git Hub Issue - https://github.com/thomsonreuters/Elektron-SDK/issues/34

sagar.s

What is the difference between unregister and uninitialize functions in ommconsumer?

Is it necessary to call unregister fuction prior to calling uninitialize function?

may.du

You don't have to call unregister function before calling uninitialized. Once the application calls uninitialize(), EMA will close user login, close channel and shutdown reactor and ommConsumer ...everything. Unregister call is for user to close an uninterested item request.

sagar.s

Hi Nipat,

When will the ESDK-1.1.2.G1 version be released? I beleive the concurrent modification exception is addressed in that version.

Thanks,

Sagar

sagar.s

Hi @Nipat Kunvutipongsak

When will the ESDK-1.1.2.G1 version be released? I beleive the concurrent modification exception is addressed in that version.

Thanks,

Sagar

warat.boonyanit

@sagar.s

It's been released as open source version on Github.

https://github.com/thomsonreuters/Elektron-SDK/releases

sagar.s

@Warat B.

Is the concurrent modification issue resolved in below version ?

Elektron SDK - Java - 1.1.1.E1

Thanks,

Sagar

Nipat Kunvutipongsak

@sagar.s

Elektron SDK - Java - 1.1.1.E1 contains a fix of the ConcurrentModificationException issue. Please see the excerpt of the latest EMA's README file below:

    Product Name: Elektron Message API - Java Edition
    Release Number: 3.1.1
    Load ID: ema3.1.1.E1.java
    Release Status: ELOAD
    Release Type: ELOAD
...
2.1.1 Service Requests Resolved In This Release
[ESDK-1120] Investigate ConcurrentModificationException in EMA (GitHub #34)
[ESDK-1220] ConcurrentModificationException while invoking dispatch() (Case No. 06107164)

abdoulaye.1.ouattara

Hello Dev Team,

Currently I have the version Elektron-SDK1.1.1.java in my application, but I got somethink like a deadlock :

"main" prio=6 tid=0x0000000002cf4000 nid=0xb38 waiting on condition [0x0000000002cee000] java.lang.Thread.State: TIMED_WAITING (parking) at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method) - parking to wait for <0x00000000cf1d2440> (a java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject) at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:226) at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2082) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.awaitTermination(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1468) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$DelegatedExecutorService.awaitTermination(Executors.java:635) at com.thomsonreuters.ema.access.OmmBaseImpl.uninitialize(OmmBaseImpl.java:300) at com.thomsonreuters.ema.access.OmmConsumerImpl.uninitialize(OmmConsumerImpl.java:102)

Could you advice please ?